Updating this view...

Refreshing authority data.

Snowdonia Learning Partnership Insights

6 schools · 459 pupils · Current academic year

2 schools have not yet compiled their learning pictures.

Authority snapshot

What the current evidence is telling us.

Evidence in current context

?

2%

7 of 349 pupils have teacher confirmation, review-ready evidence, or evidence building in their current progression context

Earlier evidence to check

?

0%

0 pupils need an earlier evidence check

Beyond this context

?

0%

No beyond-context signal in this view yet

Breadth of recent evidence

?

33%

Schools with broad recent evidence across multiple curriculum-area contexts

The learning picture is useful, with a few usage and review patterns to check first.

Direction of travel

?

How the selected cohort is changing over time.

Illustrative
12 months ago 6 months ago Now

Trend engine coming soon

Historical snapshots will power this view.

What may be driving this

A few patterns stand out across the authority.

Recent evidence breadth

?

2 schools have a narrow recent footprint

Check whether the current footprint is an intentional teaching focus or too thin for broader interpretation.

Retention and stability

?

0 schools have evidence checks

Check earlier evidence and teacher confirmations before drawing conclusions.

Professional review needed

?

0 schools need progression-context review; 0 schools need area review

Separate broader progression-context review from curriculum-area review.

Usage and setup

?

1 school needs a usage check

Check recent activity, rosters, and class coverage.

Schools to look at first

Not a ranking. These are the clearest places for a leadership conversation or professional follow-up.

Bryn Teg Primary

Leadership conversation suggested

2 signals
Usage and setup needs checking Recent evidence breadth: Insufficient

Usage and setup needs checking

First check: Pupils have not recently generated evidence evenly across the school.

Suggested first step: Review task coverage and pupil activity in the usage and setup view.

Recent evidence breadth: Insufficient

First check: Does the current footprint reflect a deliberate teaching focus, or is it too narrow for broader interpretation?

Suggested first step: Review the active curriculum-area contexts, recent pupil participation and evidence maturity before drawing school-wide conclusions.

Snowdon View Primary

Leadership conversation suggested

1 signal
Recent evidence breadth: Limited

Recent evidence breadth: Limited

First check: Does the current footprint reflect a deliberate teaching focus, or is it too narrow for broader interpretation?

Suggested first step: Review the active curriculum-area contexts, recent pupil participation and evidence maturity before drawing school-wide conclusions.

Curriculum areas to check

?

Areas where the current evidence pattern may be worth a closer look.

Measurement

65%

298 pupils affected

?

Pupils with limited or still-building evidence in this area.

Relationships Within The Number System

46%

211 pupils affected

?

Pupils with limited or still-building evidence in this area.

Interpreting Data

13%

61 pupils affected

?

Pupils with limited or still-building evidence in this area.

The Number System

11%

52 pupils affected

?

Pupils with limited or still-building evidence in this area.

Representing Data

2%

9 pupils affected

?

Pupils with limited or still-building evidence in this area.

School overview

Find the school you want to look at next.

School Pupils Usage ? Evidence breadth ? Evidence checks ? Curriculum-area review ? First look
Afon Hafren Primary

Open school view

45 healthy Moderate Healthy picture
Bryn Teg Primary

Open school view

30 uneven Insufficient Usage to check
Cwm Derwen High

Open school view

150 healthy Strong Healthy picture
Glyndŵr Primary

Open school view

60 healthy Unknown Evidence breadth to understand
Snowdon View Primary

Open school view

124 healthy Limited Evidence breadth to understand
Ysgol y Ddraig

Open school view

50 healthy Unknown Evidence breadth to understand

Cohorts to look at first

Start with the groups where the evidence raises the clearest next question.

Y4

20 pupils | Current progression context: Progression Step 3

Start here

20 pupils have limited current evidence.

Check whether schools have enough recent evidence before drawing conclusions.

Evidence thin

20

Progression-context review

0

Earlier evidence to check

0

Evidence building

0

Area worth checking

Relationships Within The Number System 100%

Y8

150 pupils | Current progression context: Progression Step 4

Review next

145 pupils have limited current evidence.

Check whether schools have enough recent evidence before drawing conclusions.

Evidence thin

145

Progression-context review

0

Earlier evidence to check

0

Evidence building

0

Area worth checking

Relationships Within The Number System 90%

Y5

45 pupils | Current progression context: Progression Step 3

Also consider

43 pupils have limited current evidence.

Check whether schools have enough recent evidence before drawing conclusions.

Evidence thin

43

Progression-context review

0

Earlier evidence to check

0

Evidence building

0

Area worth checking

Relationships Within The Number System 91%

Y3

42 pupils | Current progression context: Progression Step 2

42 pupils have limited current evidence.

Check whether schools have enough recent evidence before drawing conclusions.

Evidence thin

42

Progression-context review

0

Earlier evidence to check

0

Evidence building

0

Area worth checking

Measurement 83%

Y2

35 pupils | Current progression context: Progression Step 2

35 pupils have limited current evidence.

Check whether schools have enough recent evidence before drawing conclusions.

Evidence thin

35

Progression-context review

0

Earlier evidence to check

0

Evidence building

0

Area worth checking

Measurement 77%

Y1

33 pupils | Current progression context: Progression Step 1

33 pupils have limited current evidence.

Check whether schools have enough recent evidence before drawing conclusions.

Evidence thin

33

Progression-context review

0

Earlier evidence to check

0

Evidence building

0

Area worth checking

Measurement 76%

Full cohort breakdown

Open this when you want the detail behind the priorities above.

Y3

42 pupils across authority | Current progression context: Progression Step 2

Teacher judgement ?

0

Progression-context review ?

0

Evidence building ?

0

Evidence thin ?

42

Evidence beyond this point ?

0

Areas to check ?

Percentages show pupils affected, not scores.

Measurement 83% ? · The Number System 69% ? · Representing Data 14% ?
School Pupils ? Conf ? Progression-context review ? Bld ? Lim ? Earlier evidence to check ? Evidence breadth ?
Afon Hafren Primary 22 0 0 0 22 Moderate
Snowdon View Primary 20 0 0 0 20 Limited

Y5

45 pupils across authority | Current progression context: Progression Step 3

Teacher judgement ?

2

Progression-context review ?

0

Evidence building ?

0

Evidence thin ?

43

Evidence beyond this point ?

0

Areas to check ?

Percentages show pupils affected, not scores.

Relationships Within The Number System 91% ? · Measurement 91% ? · Interpreting Data 29% ?
School Pupils ? Conf ? Progression-context review ? Bld ? Lim ? Earlier evidence to check ? Evidence breadth ?
Afon Hafren Primary 23 0 0 0 23 Moderate
Snowdon View Primary 22 2 0 0 20 Limited

Y1

33 pupils across authority | Current progression context: Progression Step 1

Teacher judgement ?

0

Progression-context review ?

0

Evidence building ?

0

Evidence thin ?

33

Evidence beyond this point ?

0

Areas to check ?

Percentages show pupils affected, not scores.

Measurement 76% ? · Representing Data 9% ? · Interpreting Data 9% ?
School Pupils ? Conf ? Progression-context review ? Bld ? Lim ? Earlier evidence to check ? Evidence breadth ?
Bryn Teg Primary 15 0 0 0 15 Insufficient
Snowdon View Primary 18 0 0 0 18 Limited

Y2

35 pupils across authority | Current progression context: Progression Step 2

Teacher judgement ?

0

Progression-context review ?

0

Evidence building ?

0

Evidence thin ?

35

Evidence beyond this point ?

0

Areas to check ?

Percentages show pupils affected, not scores.

Measurement 77% ? · The Number System 66% ? · Collecting Data 11% ?
School Pupils ? Conf ? Progression-context review ? Bld ? Lim ? Earlier evidence to check ? Evidence breadth ?
Bryn Teg Primary 15 0 0 0 15 Insufficient
Snowdon View Primary 20 0 0 0 20 Limited

Y8

150 pupils across authority | Current progression context: Progression Step 4

Teacher judgement ?

5

Progression-context review ?

0

Evidence building ?

0

Evidence thin ?

145

Evidence beyond this point ?

0

Areas to check ?

Percentages show pupils affected, not scores.

Relationships Within The Number System 90% ? · Measurement 90% ? · Interpreting Data 20% ?
School Pupils ? Conf ? Progression-context review ? Bld ? Lim ? Earlier evidence to check ? Evidence breadth ?
Cwm Derwen High 150 5 0 0 145 Strong

Y4

20 pupils across authority | Current progression context: Progression Step 3

Teacher judgement ?

0

Progression-context review ?

0

Evidence building ?

0

Evidence thin ?

20

Evidence beyond this point ?

0

Areas to check ?

Percentages show pupils affected, not scores.

Relationships Within The Number System 100% ? · Measurement 100% ? · Interpreting Data 30% ?
School Pupils ? Conf ? Progression-context review ? Bld ? Lim ? Earlier evidence to check ? Evidence breadth ?
Snowdon View Primary 20 0 0 0 20 Limited

Y6

24 pupils across authority | Current progression context: Progression Step 3

Teacher judgement ?

0

Progression-context review ?

0

Evidence building ?

0

Evidence thin ?

24

Evidence beyond this point ?

0

Areas to check ?

Percentages show pupils affected, not scores.

Relationships Within The Number System 63% ? · Measurement 63% ? · Interpreting Data 38% ?
School Pupils ? Conf ? Progression-context review ? Bld ? Lim ? Earlier evidence to check ? Evidence breadth ?
Snowdon View Primary 24 0 0 0 24 Limited