Updating this view...
Refreshing authority data.
Caledonia Valley Council Insights
6 schools · 801 pupils · Current academic year
2 schools have not yet compiled their learning pictures.
Authority snapshot
What the current evidence is telling us.
At expected level
?91%
327 of 359 pupils are confirmed, ready for review, or building evidence at the expected level
Missing prior confirmation
?5%
14 pupils need a prior-level check
Beyond expected level
?2%
6 pupils with evidence beyond the expected level
Breadth of recent evidence
?50%
Schools with broad recent evidence across multiple curriculum-area contexts
The learning picture is useful, with prior-level confirmation gaps to check before drawing firm conclusions.
Direction of travel
?How the selected cohort is changing over time.
Trend engine coming soon
Historical snapshots will power this view.
What may be driving this
A few patterns stand out across the authority.
Recent evidence breadth
?1 school has a narrow recent footprint
Check whether the current footprint is an intentional teaching focus or too thin for broader interpretation.
Retention and stability
?4 schools have evidence checks
Check prior-level confirmations before drawing conclusions.
Professional review needed
?0 schools need whole-level review; 0 schools need area review
Separate whole-level review from curriculum-area review.
Usage and setup
?2 schools need a usage check
Check recent activity, rosters, and class coverage.
Schools to look at first
Not a ranking. These are the clearest places for a leadership conversation or professional follow-up.
Braeside Primary
Leadership conversation suggested
Usage and setup needs checking
First check: Usage may need checking in some cohorts.
Suggested first step: Review task coverage and pupil activity in the usage and setup view.
Evidence checks to make
First check: 15 pupils have a prior-level confirmation gap.
Suggested first step: Review historical judgements and transition records before drawing conclusions.
Recent evidence breadth: Insufficient
First check: Does the current footprint reflect a deliberate teaching focus, or is it too narrow for broader interpretation?
Suggested first step: Review the active curriculum-area contexts, recent pupil participation and evidence maturity before drawing school-wide conclusions.
Oakwood Primary
Leadership conversation suggested
Usage and setup needs checking
First check: Usage may need checking in some cohorts.
Suggested first step: Review task coverage and pupil activity in the usage and setup view.
Evidence checks to make
First check: 31 pupils have a prior-level confirmation gap.
Suggested first step: Review historical judgements and transition records before drawing conclusions.
Glenfinnan Rural Primary
Leadership conversation suggested
Evidence checks to make
First check: 5 pupils have a prior-level confirmation gap.
Suggested first step: Review historical judgements and transition records before drawing conclusions.
St. Judes Primary
Leadership conversation suggested
Evidence checks to make
First check: 6 pupils have a prior-level confirmation gap.
Suggested first step: Review historical judgements and transition records before drawing conclusions.
Curriculum areas to check
?Areas where the current evidence pattern may be worth a closer look.
Expressions and Equations
11%89 pupils affected
?Pupils with limited or still-building evidence in this area.
Estimation and Rounding
8%68 pupils affected
?Pupils with limited or still-building evidence in this area.
Fractions, Decimal Fractions and Percentages
8%63 pupils affected
?Pupils with limited or still-building evidence in this area.
Time
7%53 pupils affected
?Pupils with limited or still-building evidence in this area.
Number and Number Processes
6%51 pupils affected
?Pupils with limited or still-building evidence in this area.
School overview
Find the school you want to look at next.
| School | Pupils | Usage ? Overall usage health based on recent activity and setup signals. |
Evidence breadth ? Whether the school has broad, recent evidence across multiple curriculum-area contexts. This does not measure curriculum completion or teaching quality. |
Evidence checks ? Pupils whose earlier evidence or confirmation may need checking before firm conclusions are drawn. |
Curriculum-area review
? Pupils with curriculum-area evidence that may be ready for professional review. This is narrower than a progression-context or whole-level review.
|
First look |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Braeside Primary
Open school view |
104 | review suggested | Insufficient | 15 | — | Usage to check |
|
Caledonia High School
Open school view |
300 | healthy | Unknown | — | — | Evidence breadth to understand |
|
Glenfinnan Rural Primary
Open school view |
35 | healthy | Strong | 5 | — | Earlier evidence to check |
|
Lochside Primary
Open school view |
140 | healthy | Unknown | — | — | Evidence breadth to understand |
|
Oakwood Primary
Open school view |
82 | review suggested | Strong | 31 | — | Usage to check |
|
St. Judes Primary
Open school view |
140 | healthy | Strong | 6 | — | Earlier evidence to check |
Cohorts to look at first
Start with the groups where the evidence raises the clearest next question.
P1
60 pupils | Current reference point: Early Level
23 pupils have limited current evidence.
Check whether schools have enough recent evidence before drawing conclusions.
Limited evidence
23
Whole-level review
0
Earlier evidence to check
0
Building evidence
20
Area worth checking
Estimation and Rounding 48%
P6
79 pupils | Current reference point: Second Level
10 pupils need an earlier evidence or confirmation check.
Check whether this reflects missing records, transition information, or pupils genuinely needing more support.
Limited evidence
2
Whole-level review
0
Earlier evidence to check
10
Building evidence
51
Area worth checking
Data and Analysis 38%
P4
60 pupils | Current reference point: First Level
3 pupils need an earlier evidence or confirmation check.
Check whether this reflects missing records, transition information, or pupils genuinely needing more support.
Limited evidence
0
Whole-level review
0
Earlier evidence to check
3
Building evidence
44
Area worth checking
Expressions and Equations 53%
P2
40 pupils | Current reference point: First Level
Estimation and Rounding keeps appearing as an area to check.
Look for a common curriculum pattern before deciding whether this is school-specific or wider support.
Limited evidence
0
Whole-level review
0
Earlier evidence to check
0
Building evidence
24
Area worth checking
Estimation and Rounding 50%
P3
39 pupils | Current reference point: First Level
Estimation and Rounding keeps appearing as an area to check.
Look for a common curriculum pattern before deciding whether this is school-specific or wider support.
Limited evidence
0
Whole-level review
0
Earlier evidence to check
0
Building evidence
24
Area worth checking
Estimation and Rounding 49%
P5
40 pupils | Current reference point: Second Level
Fractions, Decimal Fractions and Percentages keeps appearing as an area to check.
Look for a common curriculum pattern before deciding whether this is school-specific or wider support.
Limited evidence
0
Whole-level review
0
Earlier evidence to check
0
Building evidence
22
Area worth checking
Fractions, Decimal Fractions and Percentages 50%
Full cohort breakdown
Open this when you want the detail behind the priorities above.
P1
60 pupils across authority | Current reference point: Early Level
17
0
20
23
0
Areas to check ?
Percentages show pupils affected, not scores.
| School | Pupils ? Pupils in this school and cohort. |
Conf ? Teacher professional judgement recorded at this reference point. |
Whole-level review
? Pupils whose evidence may support a broader professional review at the current reference level.
|
Bld ? Evidence is building. |
Lim ? Limited current evidence. Check usage, evidence coverage, and learning need before interpreting. |
Earlier evidence to check ? Pupils missing earlier evidence or confirmation that would help interpret the current picture. |
Evidence breadth ? This band describes whether the school has broad, recent evidence across multiple curriculum-area contexts. It does not measure curriculum completion or teaching quality. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braeside Primary | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | — | Insufficient |
| Glenfinnan Rural Primary | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | — | Strong |
| Oakwood Primary | 20 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 8 | — | Strong |
| St. Judes Primary | 20 | 14 | 0 | 6 | 0 | — | Strong |
P2
40 pupils across authority | Current reference point: First Level
16
0
24
0
0
Areas to check ?
Percentages show pupils affected, not scores.
| School | Pupils ? Pupils in this school and cohort. |
Conf ? Teacher professional judgement recorded at this reference point. |
Whole-level review
? Pupils whose evidence may support a broader professional review at the current reference level.
|
Bld ? Evidence is building. |
Lim ? Limited current evidence. Check usage, evidence coverage, and learning need before interpreting. |
Earlier evidence to check ? Pupils missing earlier evidence or confirmation that would help interpret the current picture. |
Evidence breadth ? This band describes whether the school has broad, recent evidence across multiple curriculum-area contexts. It does not measure curriculum completion or teaching quality. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braeside Primary | 15 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | — | Insufficient |
| Glenfinnan Rural Primary | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | — | Strong |
| St. Judes Primary | 20 | 16 | 0 | 4 | 0 | — | Strong |
P3
39 pupils across authority | Current reference point: First Level
15
0
24
0
0
Areas to check ?
Percentages show pupils affected, not scores.
| School | Pupils ? Pupils in this school and cohort. |
Conf ? Teacher professional judgement recorded at this reference point. |
Whole-level review
? Pupils whose evidence may support a broader professional review at the current reference level.
|
Bld ? Evidence is building. |
Lim ? Limited current evidence. Check usage, evidence coverage, and learning need before interpreting. |
Earlier evidence to check ? Pupils missing earlier evidence or confirmation that would help interpret the current picture. |
Evidence breadth ? This band describes whether the school has broad, recent evidence across multiple curriculum-area contexts. It does not measure curriculum completion or teaching quality. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braeside Primary | 14 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 0 | — | Insufficient |
| Glenfinnan Rural Primary | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | — | Strong |
| St. Judes Primary | 20 | 15 | 0 | 5 | 0 | — | Strong |
P4
60 pupils across authority | Current reference point: First Level
16
0
44
0
0
3 pupils have earlier evidence or confirmation to check (Early Level).
Areas to check ?
Percentages show pupils affected, not scores.
| School | Pupils ? Pupils in this school and cohort. |
Conf ? Teacher professional judgement recorded at this reference point. |
Whole-level review
? Pupils whose evidence may support a broader professional review at the current reference level.
|
Bld ? Evidence is building. |
Lim ? Limited current evidence. Check usage, evidence coverage, and learning need before interpreting. |
Earlier evidence to check ? Pupils missing earlier evidence or confirmation that would help interpret the current picture. |
Evidence breadth ? This band describes whether the school has broad, recent evidence across multiple curriculum-area contexts. It does not measure curriculum completion or teaching quality. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braeside Primary | 15 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | — | Insufficient |
| Glenfinnan Rural Primary | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | — | Strong |
| Oakwood Primary | 20 | 3 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 3 | Strong |
| St. Judes Primary | 20 | 13 | 0 | 7 | 0 | — | Strong |
P5
40 pupils across authority | Current reference point: Second Level
18
0
22
0
0
Areas to check ?
Percentages show pupils affected, not scores.
| School | Pupils ? Pupils in this school and cohort. |
Conf ? Teacher professional judgement recorded at this reference point. |
Whole-level review
? Pupils whose evidence may support a broader professional review at the current reference level.
|
Bld ? Evidence is building. |
Lim ? Limited current evidence. Check usage, evidence coverage, and learning need before interpreting. |
Earlier evidence to check ? Pupils missing earlier evidence or confirmation that would help interpret the current picture. |
Evidence breadth ? This band describes whether the school has broad, recent evidence across multiple curriculum-area contexts. It does not measure curriculum completion or teaching quality. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braeside Primary | 15 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | — | Insufficient |
| Glenfinnan Rural Primary | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | — | Strong |
| St. Judes Primary | 20 | 18 | 0 | 2 | 0 | — | Strong |
P6
79 pupils across authority | Current reference point: Second Level
20
0
51
2
6
10 pupils have earlier evidence or confirmation to check (First Level).
Areas to check ?
Percentages show pupils affected, not scores.
| School | Pupils ? Pupils in this school and cohort. |
Conf ? Teacher professional judgement recorded at this reference point. |
Whole-level review
? Pupils whose evidence may support a broader professional review at the current reference level.
|
Bld ? Evidence is building. |
Lim ? Limited current evidence. Check usage, evidence coverage, and learning need before interpreting. |
Earlier evidence to check ? Pupils missing earlier evidence or confirmation that would help interpret the current picture. |
Evidence breadth ? This band describes whether the school has broad, recent evidence across multiple curriculum-area contexts. It does not measure curriculum completion or teaching quality. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braeside Primary | 15 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | — | Insufficient |
| Glenfinnan Rural Primary | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | — | Strong |
| Oakwood Primary | 39 | 3 | 0 | 28 | 2 | 10 | Strong |
| St. Judes Primary | 20 | 17 | 0 | 3 | 0 | — | Strong |
P7
41 pupils across authority | Current reference point: Second Level
15
0
25
1
0
1 pupils have earlier evidence or confirmation to check (First Level).
Areas to check ?
Percentages show pupils affected, not scores.
| School | Pupils ? Pupils in this school and cohort. |
Conf ? Teacher professional judgement recorded at this reference point. |
Whole-level review
? Pupils whose evidence may support a broader professional review at the current reference level.
|
Bld ? Evidence is building. |
Lim ? Limited current evidence. Check usage, evidence coverage, and learning need before interpreting. |
Earlier evidence to check ? Pupils missing earlier evidence or confirmation that would help interpret the current picture. |
Evidence breadth ? This band describes whether the school has broad, recent evidence across multiple curriculum-area contexts. It does not measure curriculum completion or teaching quality. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braeside Primary | 15 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | — | Insufficient |
| Glenfinnan Rural Primary | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | — | Strong |
| Oakwood Primary | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | Strong |
| St. Judes Primary | 20 | 15 | 0 | 5 | 0 | — | Strong |