Updating this view...
Refreshing authority data.
Caledonia Valley Council Insights
6 schools · 800 pupils · Current academic year
Authority snapshot
What the current evidence is telling us.
At expected level
?74%
Confirmed, ready for review, or building secure evidence
Missing prior confirmation
?19%
135 pupils need a prior-level check
Beyond expected level
?0%
No beyond-expected signal in this view yet
Confidence in what we know
?83%
Schools with enough evidence to support discussion
The learning picture is useful, with prior-level confirmation gaps to check before drawing firm conclusions.
Direction of travel
?How the selected cohort is changing over time.
Trend engine coming soon
Historical snapshots will power this view.
What may be driving this
A few patterns stand out across the authority.
Evidence across the curriculum
?1 school(s) need broader evidence
Check whether evidence is spread across enough curriculum areas.
Retention and stability
?6 school(s) have confirmation gaps
Check prior-level confirmations before drawing conclusions.
Professional review needed
?2 school(s) need whole-level review; 1 need area review
Separate whole-level review from curriculum-area review.
Usage and setup
?1 school(s) need a usage check
Check recent activity, rosters, and class coverage.
Schools to support first
Not a ranking. These are the clearest places to start a conversation.
Braeside Primary
Support conversation suggested
Usage and setup needs checking
First check: Usage may need checking in some cohorts.
Suggested first step: Review task coverage and pupil activity in the usage and setup view.
Evidence confidence: Insufficient
First check: Is the evidence broad and recent enough to trust the learning picture?
Suggested first step: Check whether recent assignments are covering a broad enough range of curriculum areas.
Confirmation gaps to check
First check: 15 pupils have a prior-level confirmation gap.
Suggested first step: Review historical judgements and transition records before drawing conclusions.
Oakwood Primary
Support conversation suggested
Confirmation gaps to check
First check: 18 pupils have a prior-level confirmation gap.
Suggested first step: Review historical judgements and transition records before drawing conclusions.
Professional review needed
First check: 4 pupils may be ready for a whole-level review; 52 pupils have curriculum-area evidence ready for review.
Suggested first step: Separate whole-level review from curriculum-area review before deciding what action is needed.
St. Judes Primary
Support conversation suggested
Confirmation gaps to check
First check: 6 pupils have a prior-level confirmation gap.
Suggested first step: Review historical judgements and transition records before drawing conclusions.
Professional review needed
First check: 6 pupils may be ready for a whole-level review.
Suggested first step: Separate whole-level review from curriculum-area review before deciding what action is needed.
Caledonia High School
Support conversation suggested
Confirmation gaps to check
First check: 172 pupils have a prior-level confirmation gap.
Suggested first step: Review historical judgements and transition records before drawing conclusions.
Glenfinnan Rural Primary
Support conversation suggested
Confirmation gaps to check
First check: 5 pupils have a prior-level confirmation gap.
Suggested first step: Review historical judgements and transition records before drawing conclusions.
Lochside Primary
Support conversation suggested
Confirmation gaps to check
First check: 42 pupils have a prior-level confirmation gap.
Suggested first step: Review historical judgements and transition records before drawing conclusions.
Curriculum areas to check
?Areas where the current evidence pattern may be worth a closer look.
Number and Number Processes
13%102 pupils affected
?Pupils with limited or still-building evidence in this area.
Time
12%97 pupils affected
?Pupils with limited or still-building evidence in this area.
Measurement
11%84 pupils affected
?Pupils with limited or still-building evidence in this area.
Fractions, Decimal Fractions and Percentages
10%77 pupils affected
?Pupils with limited or still-building evidence in this area.
Estimation and Rounding
9%71 pupils affected
?Pupils with limited or still-building evidence in this area.
School overview
Find the school you want to look at next.
| School | Pupils | Usage ? Overall usage health based on recent activity and setup signals. |
Confidence ? Whether evidence is broad and recent enough to support discussion. |
Evidence checks ? Pupils whose earlier evidence or confirmation may need checking before firm conclusions are drawn. |
Review ? Pupils with evidence that may be ready for professional review. |
First look |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Braeside Primary
Open school view |
104 | review suggested | Insufficient | 15 | — | Usage to check |
|
Caledonia High School
Open school view |
300 | healthy | Strong | 172 | — | Earlier evidence to check |
|
Glenfinnan Rural Primary
Open school view |
35 | healthy | Strong | 5 | — | Earlier evidence to check |
|
Lochside Primary
Open school view |
140 | healthy | Strong | 42 | — | Earlier evidence to check |
|
Oakwood Primary
Open school view |
81 | healthy | Strong | 18 | 52 | Earlier evidence to check |
|
St. Judes Primary
Open school view |
140 | healthy | Strong | 6 | — | Earlier evidence to check |
Cohorts to look at first
Start with the groups where the evidence raises the clearest next question.
S4
75 pupils | Current reference point: Fourth Level
34 pupils need an earlier evidence or confirmation check.
Check whether this reflects missing records, transition information, or pupils genuinely needing more support.
Limited evidence
51
Ready for review
0
Earlier evidence to check
34
Building evidence
5
Area worth checking
Ideas of Chance and Uncertainty 5%
S2
75 pupils | Current reference point: Third Level
27 pupils need an earlier evidence or confirmation check.
Check whether this reflects missing records, transition information, or pupils genuinely needing more support.
Limited evidence
34
Ready for review
0
Earlier evidence to check
27
Building evidence
10
Area worth checking
Angles, Symmetry and Transformation 9%
S3
75 pupils | Current reference point: Third Level
26 pupils need an earlier evidence or confirmation check.
Check whether this reflects missing records, transition information, or pupils genuinely needing more support.
Limited evidence
21
Ready for review
0
Earlier evidence to check
26
Building evidence
18
Area worth checking
Number and Number Processes 16%
P5
60 pupils | Current reference point: Second Level
9 pupils need an earlier evidence or confirmation check.
Check whether this reflects missing records, transition information, or pupils genuinely needing more support.
Limited evidence
0
Ready for review
0
Earlier evidence to check
9
Building evidence
38
Area worth checking
Fractions, Decimal Fractions and Percentages 58%
S1
75 pupils | Current reference point: Second Level
19 pupils need an earlier evidence or confirmation check.
Check whether this reflects missing records, transition information, or pupils genuinely needing more support.
Limited evidence
16
Ready for review
0
Earlier evidence to check
19
Building evidence
15
Area worth checking
Data and Analysis 16%
P3
59 pupils | Current reference point: First Level
7 pupils need an earlier evidence or confirmation check.
Check whether this reflects missing records, transition information, or pupils genuinely needing more support.
Limited evidence
0
Ready for review
2
Earlier evidence to check
7
Building evidence
33
Area worth checking
Number and Number Processes 44%
Full cohort breakdown
Open this when you want the detail behind the priorities above.
P1
80 pupils across authority | Current reference point: Early Level
24
1
54
0
0
Areas to check ?
Percentages show pupils affected, not scores.
| School | Pupils ? Pupils in this school and cohort. |
Conf ? Teacher professional judgement recorded at this reference point. |
Rev ? Ready for professional review. |
Bld ? Evidence is building. |
Lim ? Limited current evidence. Check usage, evidence coverage, and learning need before interpreting. |
Earlier evidence to check ? Pupils missing earlier evidence or confirmation that would help interpret the current picture. |
Confidence ? Confidence reflects whether evidence is broad and recent enough to support discussion. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braeside Primary | 15 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | — | Insufficient |
| Glenfinnan Rural Primary | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | — | Strong |
| Lochside Primary | 20 | 7 | 0 | 13 | 0 | — | Strong |
| Oakwood Primary | 20 | 3 | 0 | 16 | 0 | — | Strong |
| St. Judes Primary | 20 | 14 | 1 | 5 | 0 | — | Strong |
P2
60 pupils across authority | Current reference point: First Level
24
0
36
0
0
2 pupils have earlier evidence or confirmation to check (Early Level).
Areas to check ?
Percentages show pupils affected, not scores.
| School | Pupils ? Pupils in this school and cohort. |
Conf ? Teacher professional judgement recorded at this reference point. |
Rev ? Ready for professional review. |
Bld ? Evidence is building. |
Lim ? Limited current evidence. Check usage, evidence coverage, and learning need before interpreting. |
Earlier evidence to check ? Pupils missing earlier evidence or confirmation that would help interpret the current picture. |
Confidence ? Confidence reflects whether evidence is broad and recent enough to support discussion. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braeside Primary | 15 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | — | Insufficient |
| Glenfinnan Rural Primary | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | — | Strong |
| Lochside Primary | 20 | 8 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 2 | Strong |
| St. Judes Primary | 20 | 16 | 0 | 4 | 0 | — | Strong |
P3
59 pupils across authority | Current reference point: First Level
24
2
33
0
0
7 pupils have earlier evidence or confirmation to check (Early Level).
Areas to check ?
Percentages show pupils affected, not scores.
| School | Pupils ? Pupils in this school and cohort. |
Conf ? Teacher professional judgement recorded at this reference point. |
Rev ? Ready for professional review. |
Bld ? Evidence is building. |
Lim ? Limited current evidence. Check usage, evidence coverage, and learning need before interpreting. |
Earlier evidence to check ? Pupils missing earlier evidence or confirmation that would help interpret the current picture. |
Confidence ? Confidence reflects whether evidence is broad and recent enough to support discussion. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braeside Primary | 14 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 0 | — | Insufficient |
| Glenfinnan Rural Primary | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | — | Strong |
| Lochside Primary | 20 | 9 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 7 | Strong |
| St. Judes Primary | 20 | 15 | 2 | 3 | 0 | — | Strong |
P4
80 pupils across authority | Current reference point: First Level
25
0
55
0
0
3 pupils have earlier evidence or confirmation to check (Early Level).
Areas to check ?
Percentages show pupils affected, not scores.
| School | Pupils ? Pupils in this school and cohort. |
Conf ? Teacher professional judgement recorded at this reference point. |
Rev ? Ready for professional review. |
Bld ? Evidence is building. |
Lim ? Limited current evidence. Check usage, evidence coverage, and learning need before interpreting. |
Earlier evidence to check ? Pupils missing earlier evidence or confirmation that would help interpret the current picture. |
Confidence ? Confidence reflects whether evidence is broad and recent enough to support discussion. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braeside Primary | 15 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | — | Insufficient |
| Glenfinnan Rural Primary | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | — | Strong |
| Lochside Primary | 20 | 9 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 3 | Strong |
| Oakwood Primary | 20 | 3 | 0 | 17 | 0 | — | Strong |
| St. Judes Primary | 20 | 13 | 0 | 7 | 0 | — | Strong |
P5
60 pupils across authority | Current reference point: Second Level
22
0
38
0
0
9 pupils have earlier evidence or confirmation to check (First Level).
Areas to check ?
Percentages show pupils affected, not scores.
| School | Pupils ? Pupils in this school and cohort. |
Conf ? Teacher professional judgement recorded at this reference point. |
Rev ? Ready for professional review. |
Bld ? Evidence is building. |
Lim ? Limited current evidence. Check usage, evidence coverage, and learning need before interpreting. |
Earlier evidence to check ? Pupils missing earlier evidence or confirmation that would help interpret the current picture. |
Confidence ? Confidence reflects whether evidence is broad and recent enough to support discussion. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braeside Primary | 15 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | — | Insufficient |
| Glenfinnan Rural Primary | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | — | Strong |
| Lochside Primary | 20 | 4 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 9 | Strong |
| St. Judes Primary | 20 | 18 | 0 | 2 | 0 | — | Strong |
P6
100 pupils across authority | Current reference point: Second Level
29
6
59
6
0
2 pupils have earlier evidence or confirmation to check (First Level).
Areas to check ?
Percentages show pupils affected, not scores.
| School | Pupils ? Pupils in this school and cohort. |
Conf ? Teacher professional judgement recorded at this reference point. |
Rev ? Ready for professional review. |
Bld ? Evidence is building. |
Lim ? Limited current evidence. Check usage, evidence coverage, and learning need before interpreting. |
Earlier evidence to check ? Pupils missing earlier evidence or confirmation that would help interpret the current picture. |
Confidence ? Confidence reflects whether evidence is broad and recent enough to support discussion. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braeside Primary | 15 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | — | Insufficient |
| Glenfinnan Rural Primary | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | — | Strong |
| Lochside Primary | 20 | 9 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 2 | Strong |
| Oakwood Primary | 40 | 3 | 4 | 27 | 6 | — | Strong |
| St. Judes Primary | 20 | 17 | 2 | 1 | 0 | — | Strong |
P7
60 pupils across authority | Current reference point: Second Level
22
1
37
0
0
6 pupils have earlier evidence or confirmation to check (First Level).
Areas to check ?
Percentages show pupils affected, not scores.
| School | Pupils ? Pupils in this school and cohort. |
Conf ? Teacher professional judgement recorded at this reference point. |
Rev ? Ready for professional review. |
Bld ? Evidence is building. |
Lim ? Limited current evidence. Check usage, evidence coverage, and learning need before interpreting. |
Earlier evidence to check ? Pupils missing earlier evidence or confirmation that would help interpret the current picture. |
Confidence ? Confidence reflects whether evidence is broad and recent enough to support discussion. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braeside Primary | 15 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | — | Insufficient |
| Glenfinnan Rural Primary | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | — | Strong |
| Lochside Primary | 20 | 7 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 6 | Strong |
| St. Judes Primary | 20 | 15 | 1 | 4 | 0 | — | Strong |
S1
75 pupils across authority | Current reference point: Second Level
33
0
15
16
0
19 pupils have earlier evidence or confirmation to check (First Level).
Areas to check ?
Percentages show pupils affected, not scores.
| School | Pupils ? Pupils in this school and cohort. |
Conf ? Teacher professional judgement recorded at this reference point. |
Rev ? Ready for professional review. |
Bld ? Evidence is building. |
Lim ? Limited current evidence. Check usage, evidence coverage, and learning need before interpreting. |
Earlier evidence to check ? Pupils missing earlier evidence or confirmation that would help interpret the current picture. |
Confidence ? Confidence reflects whether evidence is broad and recent enough to support discussion. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caledonia High School | 75 | 33 | 0 | 15 | 16 | 19 | Strong |
S2
75 pupils across authority | Current reference point: Third Level
26
0
10
34
0
27 pupils have earlier evidence or confirmation to check (Second Level).
Areas to check ?
Percentages show pupils affected, not scores.
| School | Pupils ? Pupils in this school and cohort. |
Conf ? Teacher professional judgement recorded at this reference point. |
Rev ? Ready for professional review. |
Bld ? Evidence is building. |
Lim ? Limited current evidence. Check usage, evidence coverage, and learning need before interpreting. |
Earlier evidence to check ? Pupils missing earlier evidence or confirmation that would help interpret the current picture. |
Confidence ? Confidence reflects whether evidence is broad and recent enough to support discussion. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caledonia High School | 75 | 26 | 0 | 10 | 34 | 27 | Strong |
S3
75 pupils across authority | Current reference point: Third Level
23
0
18
21
0
26 pupils have earlier evidence or confirmation to check (Second Level).
Areas to check ?
Percentages show pupils affected, not scores.
| School | Pupils ? Pupils in this school and cohort. |
Conf ? Teacher professional judgement recorded at this reference point. |
Rev ? Ready for professional review. |
Bld ? Evidence is building. |
Lim ? Limited current evidence. Check usage, evidence coverage, and learning need before interpreting. |
Earlier evidence to check ? Pupils missing earlier evidence or confirmation that would help interpret the current picture. |
Confidence ? Confidence reflects whether evidence is broad and recent enough to support discussion. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caledonia High School | 75 | 23 | 0 | 18 | 21 | 26 | Strong |
S4
75 pupils across authority | Current reference point: Fourth Level
19
0
5
51
0
34 pupils have earlier evidence or confirmation to check (Third Level).
Areas to check ?
Percentages show pupils affected, not scores.
| School | Pupils ? Pupils in this school and cohort. |
Conf ? Teacher professional judgement recorded at this reference point. |
Rev ? Ready for professional review. |
Bld ? Evidence is building. |
Lim ? Limited current evidence. Check usage, evidence coverage, and learning need before interpreting. |
Earlier evidence to check ? Pupils missing earlier evidence or confirmation that would help interpret the current picture. |
Confidence ? Confidence reflects whether evidence is broad and recent enough to support discussion. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caledonia High School | 75 | 19 | 0 | 5 | 51 | 34 | Strong |